Radcliffe’s New Version of Equus Draws Crowds

It’s the controversial play that details one man’s love towards a chicken but London audiences can’t get enough of Daniel Radcliffe and his cockerel in this new reinterpretation of Peter Shaffer’s classic 1973 play, Equus.
Radcliffe plays a young boy left traumatised when he mutilates his pet cockerel, Jeremy, and Richard Griffiths plays the psychologist set the task of unlocking this mysterious and taboo relationship.
Despite the positive reaction of audiences, London’s theatre critics have questioned the alterations made to the play. The boy’s love of horses in the original has been changed to a love for fowl, leading Griffiths to laugh off suggestions that the change was made for the sake of cheap innuendo or internet search engines.
‘How could we get real horses onto such a small stage?’ he asks. ‘I think the director’s alterations are justified once you see how Daniel Radcliffe has formed such a close working relationship with his cock. I know Daniel learned to handle owls for the Harry Potter films but handling a cock just isn’t the same.’
‘I’m enjoying the experience of acting in front of a live audience,’ Radcliffe admits, ‘but we’re all finding it difficult working with animals. Being on stage with a live chicken means we have to be ready to improvise our movements. A cock can be very unpredictable and we have to be quick to react to whatever it decides to do.’
Audiences will continue to queue up to see Daniel Radcliffe and his cockerel until later in the year when the play is expected to move to Broadway.






February 25th, 2007 at 4:45 pm
Bad, bad, David. Don’t go putting ideas in people’s heads about beating up chickens, it will just not do! You know full well humans need little encouragement to behave like lemmings and sheep.
But thanks for the link… I think…
February 25th, 2007 at 5:05 pm
It’s all about chicken love.
February 25th, 2007 at 10:51 pm
What a ……. (me is not going for the obvious here)
February 26th, 2007 at 6:31 pm
I’d like to point out that I’ve nothing to do with chickens. Unless it’s something to do with chicken soup.
February 26th, 2007 at 6:35 pm
What an unfortunate coincidence, Jeremy. That or your name was lodged at the back of my brain. It’s good to see you’re back in one piece.
August 13th, 2007 at 6:03 am
dude, their makeing him say cock instead of cockeral cuz he showed his cock
October 24th, 2007 at 5:49 pm
Working with animals ?!?!?!?!?!?!
And with a cock??
Dan, you’re having a great love for animals
You’re fantastic!!! I love you a lot….
October 24th, 2007 at 6:01 pm
Dear Lord, please save me…